Justice Ginsburg: will History miss her?

Will historians say that our civilization is worse than Nazi Germany and that voters were more neglectful than the Germans who elected Hitler?

Imagine a Supreme Court Judge decides slavery is legal again and the Executive and Legislative Powers allow slave hunting in America: wouldn’t it be considered a coup?

To defend freedom, Americans went to the extent of a civil war, why is it different with abortion?

Justice Ginsburg was part of a globalist plan, which costed more than 100 million lives and 500 billion dollars. The same Judiciary coup has been attempted in dozens of countries like Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Germany, Kenya, etc.

Every 4^th of July Americans have a reason to remember how abortion violates the very essence of America, engraved in the Declaration of Independence of 1776:

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

In 1868, the Fourteenth Amendment stated: “nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”

A 2017 Harvard study[1] proved it always granted protection of all persons’ right to live, including prenatal persons.

Since 2013, nobody in the world has won “The million dollar bet of life”[2]: it is impossible to prove that killing an innocent living human being isn’t immoral. From conception, any person has human dignity and rights, especially the unborn.

In 1973, Roe v. Wade “legalized” slavery in America: abortion defines that a living human being is a disposable thing, not a person with “unalienable rights”, the very definition of slavery.

In 1857, the Dred Scott decision, the Supreme Court pushed federal slavery over State law, contributing to the ignition of the American Civil War.

In 1865, the Thirteenth Amendment stated: “Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.”

Justice Antonin Scalia (RIP) wrote in 1992: “Dred Scott ... rested upon the concept of ‘substantive due process’[3] that the Court praises and employs today. Indeed, Dred Scott was very possibly the first application of substantive due process in the Supreme Court, the original precedent for... Roe v. Wade.”[4]

Even in antebellum times, there were regulations against dismembering slaves alive or stabbing them in the neck like in partial birth abortion: “delivering the body of the baby, keeping the head in the birth canal, cutting the skull open, and sucking the brains out”.[5]

Those babies have fully functional brains and are viable outside the womb: many could survive without neonatal care!

Roe enslaved a whole new category of human beings[6], just because they lived in a place called womb, the new Missouri Compromise line, which was soon to be erased with the acceptance of:

a) partial birth abortion and

b) birth without neonatal care: babies being left in agony to die on a tray after failed abortions. This will be momentarily solved when Trump signs the “born alive executive order”[7], but could easily be changed by a future president. By the way, Trump is the only president doing this since Roe!

Since 1973, America is no longer the land of the free, but of pre and neonatal slavery. Roe became the vilest Supreme Court ruling in American history, with more dread than the Dred abuse. It violated over a hundred years of consistent pro-life Supreme Court rulings. It ripped apart the international treaties of human rights signed after World War II, especially those protecting the handicapped.

A judge should only interpret the law and apply it impartially to an individual case. Roe didn’t just twist and stretch the interpretation of the Constitution. Roe was a constitutional amendment to murder babies, voted by 7 tyrant justices, not “the people”. It was imposed over governors and legislatures elected by hundreds of millions of votes. In the Division of Powers, the Supreme Court has no power to legislate: sanctioning abortion without it being debated by society and Congress. Those justices treated voters just like those babies, like trash.

Roe v. Wade was a coup d'état of the abortion tyranny. Only Congress has the power of ruling the law of the land. In a functional democracy, the Legislative Power should have impeached the Justices that violated the Constitution but instead, it peacefully accepted the Supreme Court had a right to usurp the legislative power. Even worse, the Executive Power obeyed such an illegal law without question.

Even if the impeachment majority was not possible, Congress could have passed a law banning the slavery of abortion, especially if we consider the 13^th Amendment: “Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.”

The coup meant collusion between the three Powers in violation of the constitutional checks and balances: the forefathers were rolling in their tombs… and still are!

The next power in line to defy the tyranny was the State, even to the point of peaceful secession[8] from a “slavist” federal government, but instead, just like Dread, governors and the legislatures obeyed the Supreme Court ruling. There is no part of the Constitution stating that the Supreme Court can make a constitutional amendment and yet authorities are accepting one against the most important human right, upon which all other rights depend: the right to live.

If a person swears in office over the Constitution but intends to violate it, the oath is not valid (perjury) and the authority is not legitimate, just an usurper. There is absolutely no obligation to obey an immoral rule from an illegitimate authority, especially if it violates human rights.

Not only the king is naked, there is no king, but pro-abortion usurpers who get away with murder!

Under such an attack to the Constitution, should the military have taken power and called for elections, after proscribing the people accessory to the institutional coup?

Maybe a simple warning to immediately stop all abortions and abortifacients would have been enough.

It is noteworthy that the Catholic Conference of Bishops of Venezuela stated that the military’s “first obligation is with the people” and that they are “called to defend the lives of all… without any distinction…”.[9]

In sum, there was a continuous abortion coup lead by majority Supreme Court Justices in:

1965 Griswold v. Connecticut [10]

1973 Roe v. Wade

1989 Webster v. Reproductive Health Services

1992 Planned Parenthood v. Casey

2000 Stenberg v. Carhart

2016 Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt

In 1993, Ginsburg was named Justice by Clinton for her support of the coup and her approval of unconstitutional judiciary “activism”.

Her designed career started 30 years earlier: from 1961 to 1963, Ginsburg was a research associate and then an associate director of the Columbia Law School Project on International Procedure; she learned Swedish to co-author a book in Sweden with Anders Bruzelius on civil Swedish procedure.[11] Why would anybody study “procedure” in a country with a completely different legal system, not applicable in the USA? “Ginsburg advocated the use of foreign law and norms to shape U.S. law in judicial opinions.”[12]She was used to quote foreign law in her sentences: as early as 1971, “her first argument before the court, Reed v. Reed, she cited two German cases”.Fond of the “internationalists”[13] (i.e. globalists), she was instrumental to enslave the USA under global governance.

In 1977, she spent a year as a fellow of the Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences at Stanford University. Fellows were appointed by inside recommendation, not applications. The Center was founded by the Ford Foundation, connected to the deep state CIA and the Rockefeller Foundation.[14]Partially funded by the deep state, Ford Foundation has currently over 13 billion dollars in assets.[15] It funded extreme feminist ideologies that destroy women[16] and marginalize boys and men[17]. It also funded Planned Parenthood together with the cabal of Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Buffett Foundation, Turner Foundation, Cullmans, etc. By the way, each year the abortion coup costs 10 billion a year of taxpayers’ money for abortion (1 billion for Planned Parenthood[18], 2 billion to promote it abroad[19] and so on): over 500 billion dollars since Roe.

In Sweden, Ginsburg was also “trained” in a strange notion of “gender equality”, one that turned women (womb-men) into men without wombs, excluding any rights to protect motherhood but including whatever prevents birth, from abortifacient contraception[20], abortifacients and abortion. She thought Roe v. Wade’s argument of women’s privacy to support abortion was wrong: “it would have been better to approach it under the equal protection clause” because restricting it impeded gender equality.”[21]

In 2000 Stenberg v. Carhart, citing Parenthood vs. Casey, she stroke down the ban of 30 states on the barbarian practice of partial birth abortion, because they supposedly “violated the Constitution”. She wouldn’t even listen to the few babies that survived a botched abortion, then adults, who are 100% in favour of the right to live.[22]

In 2007 Gonzales v. Carhart, she voted against a federal partial birth abortion ban.

In 2016 Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt, she voted against a Texas law which required safety measures in abortion “clinics” to save women’s lives in botched abortions and said: “How could you trust legislatures in view of the restrictions states are imposing?”[23]

In sum, Justice Ginsburg had a leading role in the bloody dictatorship which vanished over 100 million innocent babies[24], the GAG (Great American Genocide). That queen was naked indeed. Law and order meant nothing to her, for instance, even before 2015 Obergefell v. Hodges, she considered herself above the law and began marrying same-sex couples. Ginsburg was a mass murderer who will not be missed by History. Yet, she received the Lay in State posthumous tribute.[25]

Let's pray for her soul, that her seat will be taken by a pro-Constitution God-fearing Justice before next election and that America unites to end of the abortion dictatorship. If you want to “choose life” (Deuteronomy 30:15-20), beware, Biden and democrats don’t want that type of choice.

America is unique. Which other country requires to swear “under God” in a pledge of allegiance? No other fought as hard as America against discrimination of religion in COVID lockdowns. The USA is the only country in the world that printed billions of times “In God we Trust”… and God blessed America.

There is no other country in the whole world that cherishes freedom as much: “Let’s make America free again”. Is the USA “home of the brave”? The whole world is looking up to the brave fighters for life. A hundred million little babies are waiting for America to “fight the good fight” (2 Timothy 4:7).

[1] Craddock, Joshua J., Protecting Prenatal Persons: Does the Fourteenth Amendment Prohibit Abortion? (May 15, 2017). Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, Vol. 40, No. 2, 2017, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2970761

[2]http://intolerant-tolerants.blogspot.com/2011/12/scientific-proof-that-abortion-is.html

[3]“A principle allowing courts to protect certain fundamental rights from government interference, even if procedural protections are not present or the rights are not specifically mentioned in the US Constitution. Courts have identified the basis for such protection from the due process clauses of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution, which prohibit the federal and state governments, respectively, from depriving any person of “life, liberty, or property, without due process of law”.

Critics argue judges are making determinations of policy and morality that properly belong with legislators ("legislating from the bench"), they are reading doctrines and principles into the Constitution that are not expressed in or implied by the document, or they are claiming power to expand the liberty of some people at the expense of other people's liberty (such as in Dred Scott v. Sandford).
Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr., a proponent of legal realism, wrote, in 1930: “I have not yet adequately expressed the more than anxiety that I feel at the ever increasing scope given to the Fourteenth Amendment in cutting down what I believe to be the constitutional rights of the States.”

Originalists, such as Supreme Court Justices Clarence Thomas and Antonin Scalia, have called substantive due process a ‘judicial usurpation’.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Substantive_due_process

[4] Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992)
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=505&invol=833

[5]https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/with-ruth-bader-ginsburgs-death-americas-soul-will-be-defined-over-abortion

[6] “Male slaves had no paternal rights” just as today, males, neo-slaves to the law, have no paternal rights: women can abort without their consent. “Female slaves were recognized as mothers only to the extent that their status doomed their children’s fate”, just as female neo-slaves can doom the children’s fate.

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/02/opinion/putting-an-antebellum-myth-about-slave-families-to-rest.html

[7]https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/517807-trump-says-hell-sign-order-aimed-at-protecting-babies-born-alive

[8]https://www.wect.com/story/20078710/petitions-to-white-house-call-for-states-to-secede-from-us/

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/texas-secession-petition-qualifies-for-white-house-response_n_2125159

[9]https://cruxnow.com/global-church/2017/07/venezuelas-bishops-blast-referendum-call-military-defend-people/

[10]A Connecticut law prohibited “any drug, medicinal article or instrument for the purpose of preventing conception.” The court held that the statute was unconstitutional, and that "the clear effect of [the Connecticut law ... is to deny disadvantaged citizens ... access to medical assistance and up-to-date information in respect to proper methods of birth control.” The “right to privacy needs protection from governmental intrusion…” That was the real beginning of legal abortion, since all non-barrier contraceptives act as abortifacients. They are not medical, i.e.medicines because pregnancy is not a sickness. The right to privacy is clearly not above harming or killing a human being. This case was the base for:

• 1972 Eisenstadt v. Baird: right to birth control for unmarried couples
• 1973 Roe v. Wade
• 1977 Carey v. Population Services International: right to contraception for 16+ years of age
• 2003 Lawrence v. Texas: right to homosexual relations (sex not opened to life)
• 2015 Obergefell v. Hodges: right to same-sex “marriage”

The battle against abortion is lost without understanding the root cause: “safe sex” not only because of abortifacients but with faulty contraception. Who would tolerate an airbag or parachute with a 15% failure rate? Yet, sex ed is teaching kids to go have fun and throw themselves off a cliff with a 1 in 10 chance of zero protection, leading to “unexpected” pregnancy, which funnels the demand for abortion.

http://intolerant-tolerants.blogspot.com/2011/12/safe-sex-100-effective-contraception.html

[11]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg#Academia

[12]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg#International_law

[13]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg#International_law

[14]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ford_Foundation#Relationship_with_the_United_States_Government

[15]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ford_Foundation#Relationship_with_the_United_States_Government

[16] Hoff Sommers, Christina, Who Stole Feminism?: How Women Have Betrayed Women, Simon&Schuster,1995, ISBN 978-0-6848-0156-8

[17] Hoff Sommers, Christina, The War Against Boys: How Misguided Policies are Harming Our Young Men, Simon&Schuster,2015, ISBN 978-1-5011-2542-3.

[18]That merits another investigative report starting with:

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/breaking-trump-admin-cuts-60-million-from-planned-parenthood

https://www.heritage.org/marriage-and-family/commentary/new-report-shows-planned-parenthood-raked-15-billion-taxpayer-funds

Ross, Janell. August 4, 2015. How Planned Parenthood actually uses its federal funding. The Washington Post.

Calmes, Jackie (September 1, 2015). Louisiana Lays Bare Difficulty in Push to Cut Planned Parenthood Funding. The New York Times. Retrieved November 5, 2015.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planned_Parenthood#Funding

[19]https://www.pop.org/trump-administration-once-again-expands-the-mexico-city-policy-this-time-to-foreign-contractors/

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/us-still-gives-millions-to-american-pro-abort-groups-that-work-internationally-new-plan-would-stop-it/

https://c-fam.org/friday_fax/abortion-groups-panic-as-senators-target-loopholes-in-mexico-city-policy/

[20]http://www.lifeissues.net/writers/kah/kah_03howpillworks1.html

[21]https://www.nytimes.com/2020/09/21/us/ruth-bader-ginsburg-Roe-v-wade.html

[22]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uLzwbNVpGjY

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hOWMmx6eBjU

[23]http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/conservatives-condemn-ruth-bader-ginsburgs-abortion-comments

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/courts_law/the-forgotten-history-of-justice-ginsburgs-criticism-of-Roe-v-wade/2016/03/01/9ba0ea2e-dfe8-11e5-9c36-e1902f6b6571_story.html

[24]Including those killed by abortifacient contraception, abortifacients and surgical abortions.

http://www.numberofabortions.com/

https://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/news/politics/reality-check/2015/03/06/million-abortions-claim-checks/24530159/

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/20/upshot/abortion-pills-rising-use.html

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-abortion-pills/us-states-unsure-how-to-halt-online-sales-of-abortion-pills-amid-clinic-crackdown-idUSKCN1TS1AB

[25]Presidents, military commanders, Justices of the Supreme Court, and members of Congress are granted the honor of lying in state, either authorized by a congressional resolution or approved by the congressional leadership. https://www.aoc.gov/what-we-do/programs-ceremonies/lying-in-state-honor