Taking On the Abortion-Loving Media Industry

My Google alerts are set to notify me about articles in the media published about abortion. Every day, like clockwork, my inbox receives a list of them. The headlines are inevitably pro-abortion.

Sample Headlines

Just one day’s headlines from December 23rd, 2024 read like this:

“Abortion opponents shift focus to pills with lawsuits, proposed laws - NBC10 Philadelphia”

“BBC apologises after criticism from illegal abortion trial judge”

“Mixed ruling leaves Missouri abortion rights in limbo despite ballot measure - The Guardian”

“Are abortion bans across America causing deaths? The states that passed them are doing ...” – CNN

“Abortion opponents shift focus to pills with lawsuits, proposed laws and possible federal action” – AP News

“Josh Gottheimer promised an abortion protection bill. Eight months later, he hasn't moved it.” – Politico

“Even after voters, and now a judge, backed abortion rights, access in Missouri will remain difficult” – The Beacon

“Learn about Abortion Bans, Anti-LGBTQ+ Legislation, and more from an Intersectional Feminist Lens” – Ithaca College

“A judge says Missouri's abortion ban isn't enforceable, but there's no start date for abortions”

“Circuit judge rules Missouri abortion bans are unconstitutional following passage of Amendment 3”

“Sarah Leonard on X: "I wrote about the growing phenomenon of abortion debt Thanks to ..” – X

That’s ten articles across ten different platforms, all clearly in favor of – let’s put it in its proper context – mothers voluntarily choosing to kill their unborn children.

More Accurate Reporting

If we were to fix these headlines to accurately report on what’s happening, here is how they would read:

· People opposed to child murder focus on stopping the distribution of pills that kill babies in the womb with lawsuits and proposed laws

· The BBC apologizes for helping a woman accused of taking pills she ordered to murder her child in the womb escape justice by deliberately causing a mistrial through sloppy reporting

· Mixed ruling leaves Missouri’s right to kill your baby in the womb in limbo despite voters supporting it

· Are bans against killing babies causing deaths? The states that passed them (the bans) are doing little to find out.

· Those opposed to murdering children in the womb switch their focus to the pills that murder children in the womb with lawsuits, proposed laws, and possible federal action.

· Josh Gottheimer promised to protect laws that allow mothers to murder their unborn children. Eight months later, he hasn’t moved it.

· Even after voters, and now a judge, backed a mother’s right to kill her unborn child, access to unborn child killers remains difficult.

· Learn about bans against killing children in the womb, anti-life denying and destroying behaviors, and more from the stance of someone who hates men, babies, and healthy families

· A judge says Missouri’s ban against murdering babies in the womb isn’t enforceable, but there’s no start date for being able to kill babies in the womb

· Sarah Leonard reported on X that there’s a growing number of women in debt for killing their babies in the womb

Those headlines don’t make for pretty reading. But they are more accurate to what’s happening.

There are two kinds of abortions: the spontaneous kind that a woman didn’t chose and which are a genuine, heartbreaking tragedy for the couples that experience them and the elective kind, which amount to a woman hiring a hitman to take out her own child.

It’s the second kind which the media seems to adore so much that they are willing to protect anyone even remotely connected to this death cult.

And that’s what it is: A cult of death, where the price of admission is the willingness to destroy your own offspring in order to gain admittance. A cult where membership is not only encouraged but outright sanctioned by the media, celebrities, and influencers of all stripes.

The Real Question: Why?

Why are the voices that stand in direct opposition to the madness being silenced and sidelined by the media?

Maybe it’s a question of who owns our media and who funds it. According to Harvard researchers, BlackRock and Vanguard own:

- Eighteen percent of Fox News

- Sixteen Percent of CBS and Sixty Minutes

- Thirteen Percent of Comcast, which owns NBC, MSNBC, CNBC, and the Sky media group

- Twelve percent of CNN

- Twelve Percent of Disney, which owns ABC and FiveThirtyEight

- Ten to Fourteen percent of Gannett, which owns more than 250 Gannett daily newspapers and USA Today

- Ten percent of the Sinclair local television news, which controls 72% of U.S. Households’ local TV stations

- A large, unspecified chunk of Graham Media Group, which owns Slate and Foreign Policy

Who is BlackRock’s CEO? Larry Fink. This man is a lifelong Democrat and manages more than $11.4 TRILLION dollars in investment assets, controlling the policies of businesses, universities, the healthcare and insurance industries, and other organizations by controlling the flow of their money. He’s also part of the enforcement team for the Human Rights Campaign.

The Human Rights Campaign rewards corporations for supporting anti-life policies such as paying for abortions, funding Planned Parenthood, and championing the LGTBQ+ movements by increasing the amount of investment dollars they receive. Companies that don’t play nice don’t get the money and get shut out of the network of support that participants receive as a reward for participating in the death cult. Vanguard’s CEO, Salim Ramji, is a BlackRock veteran.

Buying the Media, Burying the Opposition

Investors like George Soros, Warren Buffet, and Bill Gates all pour plenty of money into Planned Parenthood, inflating its coffers and allowing it to invest heavily in buying media advertising. They do this through things like the Planned Parenthood Action Fund. It’s hard to remain objective when your main funding sources stand firmly in favor of killing babies in the womb.

This can lead to hiring preferences for those who are already in favor of the policies they’re going to have to promote to keep the money flowing toward them. It can also lead to anyone who stands in favor of life-promoting policies leaving their job to avoid promoting things they know are going to destroy it.

What’s the Advantage to Promoting Death?

It doesn’t seem logical for companies – and the investors that back them - to promote policies that actively work to reduce the number of potential buyers in your future. That is, until you understand that these investment firms are all dancing to the World Economic Forum’s tune.

And that tune is a Pied Pipper’s song of needing to reduce the planet’s population by 90 percent – but not of the “important” people like them.  

They want to reduce the population of the “undesirables” – the poor, the homeless, the disabled, the elderly, the “uneducated” - and all those who stand in the way of their destructive policies. Rather than putting their investing powers to use promoting life and finding real solutions to modern problems that don’t involve death, they find it easier to rid the planet of those they find tiresome so they don’t have to feel the pinprick of their conscience when they hear about things like children going hungry or adults struggling to find purpose and work in their communities.

A 4-Point Solution to the Present Problems

I see, ultimately, four steps required to solve the present problems.

1. Taking Back Control of the Media Through Citizen Reporting

There is a way to fight back against the mainstream media: citizen reporting. The essentials of it would be to have a website available where local citizens could report tips and choose to make those tips either public or anonymous. Anonymous tips get de-prioritized in the processing but still have a chance to be investigated.

Then, those tips are passed on to a designated team member to investigate. All persons mentioned in the tip or connected to the story must be interviewed for their side of the story. A designated phone line can be established as well as a designated P.O. Box so that those who aren’t tech savvy can be given the freedom to call in or write in their tips.

All Phoned in tips and interviews are recorded and mailed tips are scanned and preserved. All facts are verified by two independent people prior to publication. This ensures the maximum integrity with minimal risk of damaging people with false accusations.

Citizen Reporting must be self-funded with support coming from subscribers. Sponsorships and media advertising leave too much room for those who pay to influence how the reporting is done. Government funding means government control over what gets reported, when it gets reported, and how. Empowering ordinary citizens to report with journalistic integrity must be the goal.

2. Training the Public to Recognize Bias

Another thing that absolutely must be done is to train the public to recognize media bias such as the bias around supporting the murder of unborn children.

Whenever the media march lockstep, arm-in-arm on any topic and bring no new perspectives on it, or are openly discarding key facts in order to throw their support behind a cause, the public must not only recognize it but call the media out on it. This does require critical thinking, which is something else that the public must be trained to do.

3. Training the Public in Critical Thinking

Asking the right questions and exhibiting intellectual curiosity not only for other people’s ideas and thoughts, but of their own, asking “why” they do what they do, is key to stopping the spread of something media outlets tell the public to be wary of: disinformation.

After all, when the media participates in lies like calling the murder of unborn children health care or sanitizing what it is by applying a distancing label like abortion to it, that’s a recipe for disinformation. It actively obfuscates the truth in an effort to make the lie more palatable to the public.

4. Tackling the Mindset Driving the Death Cult

A huge thing that drives this death cult is the way our post-Christian Western Culture teaches us to value one another by the size of our pocket book. Money was created to measure two things – and two things only: the amount of trust we’ve earned we can deliver a given result and the amount of commitment the other party has to getting that result.

It's a system we designed to protect our hearts from being taken advantage of by other people. It comes with the inherent problem of teaching people to engage in transactional relationships rather than engaging in genuine loving service, but it can be a step in the right direction as to get the money you must learn to develop the relationships and the integrity needed to earn the trust.

However, where our society went wrong was that instead of keeping our means of valuing things by how much they cost, we began to apply that same logic to how much a person was worth. That is an abuse of the system and something Christ worked hard to correct.

We must get back to our Catholic values and the roots of it: love for our fellow human beings. It’s a kind of love that doesn’t ask how much a baby’s going to cost to bring into the world. Instead, it sees each baby conceived as God’s investment of adding more love to a world in desperate need of it.

It sees each human being as having inestimable worth because of the contributions it can make to growing the amount of love that exists in the world. Even the most disabled among us can help us grow in love by being a recipient of our love, and even the most able among us can benefit from serving those who are the weakest.

My Response-Ability for Solving the Problems

I wasn’t alive when Planned Parenthood was founded. I didn’t contribute to the creation of the contraceptive pill or participate in the passing of the laws that made murdering a child in the womb legal. This problem of mothers choosing to kill their children in the womb has caused over 1 billion deaths – far more than Hitler, Stalin, or Mao combined- since 1973.

I didn’t create it, but I can take ownership of solving it. I have 0% control over what the World Economic Forum, George Soros, Bill Gates, Larry Fink, Salim Ramji, or Planned Parenthood does. What I do have is 100% control over what I choose to do in response to it. That’s what makes me response-able for doing everything I can to solve the problems I see. And writing this article is where I begin.