Assessment of the means by which Catholicism may be institutionalized among a secular populace, the manifestation of which is evident in the Langford campaign

The success of a nation can be determined by the extent of its willingness to embrace a preferential ideation, the expression of which is often called “nationalism”; and the failure of a nation can likewise be marked by a populace which may be indurated, woebegone, or idly frivolous, by which it is rendered suicidal. 

The conception of America as merely a series of various ideas and concepts, or values and beliefs, necessitates Americans to by default be indurated, woebegone, idle, and frivolous, and thus failed. 

Americans are often claimed to be defined by these arbitrary values, and imputation of these values is often deemed criteria for immigration to America. However, if Americans are so loosely defined, this risks branding billions across the world, irrespective of association with America, as honorary Americans. It further welcomes mass immigration from anyone and anywhere, because there is a surplus of individuals who share arbitrary values in every place, as that which is arbitrary is universal.

If the ideology of America were simply defined, then certainly it would be more exclusionary. But as the ideology of America remains undefined, so as not to exclude anyone, America ceases to carry on in any fashion orthodox to any other nation, and thus the essence of America is abated entirely. 

In virtually every other country in the world, the nation itself is defined by the people within that nation, and shared ideas and values are secondary to shared blood and relation. America can not reasonably claim the same thing on a solely historical basis, but it can prudently maintain homogeneity and a unified, singular body politic on the basis of its beneficiality and success for those for whom America exists to serve. 

If defined by anything other than people, America errs in its very essence, as a country without interest in its people, or recognition that it is defined by its people, can never serve the interests of its people.

Thus, we come to the present, in which an American, by the natural conclusion of the description thereof, can be an earnest patriot of Cambodia, or a lover of liberty from Botswana, or a paramour of democracy from Afghanistan, or any other such foreign oddity. Thus, it is proclaimed that immigration from all of these countries must be accepted, simply on account of the immigrants upholding arbitrary ideologies, ignoring incompatibility in entirety. 

Due to this, the religious nature of America is also subject to equal erraticism. Though founded as a Protestant country, it appears difficult for America to maintain its status as the world’s great bastion of Protestant Christianity, simply on account of the state of Protestantism at large. Evangelicals generally reject historical Christianity in its entirety, and thus are unable to confront institutional problems without fleeing the institutions altogether. At the same time, liberalized Mainline Protestants often reject core tenets of Christianity such as the Trinity, the hypostatic union, the incarnation, original sin, and salvation through Christ, and thus they are unable to maintain American institutions which are based on a non-obstructed historical Christianity.

The ability to carry America forward lies in the hands of Catholicism. By the will of the Catholic minority in America, the essence of America can be reclaimed. In recognition of this, the young politician Kyle Langford leads this path forward, positioning himself as the asseverate of the Catholic triumph at hand.

In the above video, Mr. Langford proposes an intriguing policy increasing competition for matrimonial availability. Indeed, the modern capitalists speak glowingly of competition, unless it interferes with a wide selection of cheap immigrant labor, at which point they are unwilling to defend such a policy. 

Mr. Langford recognizes that mass immigration is untenable, and the exploitation of immigrant labor by American corporations is directly at odds with the Catholic values which he represents. By deporting all alien men, Mr. Langford ensures that Californian men receive greater job opportunities in construction, manufacturing, and agriculture, but by allowing a share of alien women to remain behind, he ensures that there is a wider marital selection for Californian men, without interfering in the workforce, as these women do not work.

The proposition is not necessarily directed towards the incentivization of miscegenation, but rather it seeks to improve the quality of native Californian caucasian females, who are placed in competition with alien females. By espousing such a brilliant policy, Mr. Langford ensures that demographic replacement is negligible, as the vast majority of aliens in general will be emigrated, he ensures that there are more job openings in fields of work with a plethora of alien labor, he ensures that native Californians are paid more for their work as they will not compete with cheap foreign labor, he ensures that there are more options for marriage, and he ensures that the general quality of women will improve due to competition.

In this second video, Mr. Langford goes into more specific detail on uniquely Catholic initiatives. Prison reformation, though often undiscussed by Republican politicians, is undoubtedly a worthy pursuit in which mercy, charity, benevolence, and forgiveness can be extended to the lowliest among us. In the words of St. Thomas Aquinas, “Justice without mercy is cruelty; mercy without justice is dissolution.”(Commentary on the Gospel of St. Matthew) Aquinas expresses the self-evident truth that the capacity for compassion is necessary to Christianity, and that justice with no charity is indeed inhumane.

Mr. Langford’s attempts at prison reformation demonstrate a will to implicitly institutionalize Catholicism in secular establishments, so as to fulfill the triumph over liberalism in its succession. 

Mr. Langford further espouses a nationalist ideology, which reflects the initial point of the embrace of a preferential ideation. The willingness to place California First, suggests a consideration for the people of California, whom Mr. Langford intends to represent, and that this consideration must be greater than foreign countries, global special interests, multinational corporations, federal bureaucrats, and even other states. The suggestion of consideration for Californians First, hence the title of his Political Action Committee, suggests a nationalism by which countries, states, and peoples thrive. 

In short, recognition of the necessity for institutionalized Catholicism, within a state thoroughly concerned with the interests of its people, provides a prototype on which other such achievements can be made, and other such advancements can be fostered. The Langford campaign demonstrates above all else the willingness to progress towards institutionalized Catholicism, and for all of the fruits of the true church to be made manifest in California and America at large.