Re: ''Reproductive Technologies: Guidelines for Catholic Couples''
Like many young Catholic males of the 1970s and early 1980s, I was attracted by the heroism of clerical and religious life and wondered whether I might be called to serve God as a priest or religious. It that same era, I was blessed to know a young priest, who was about 10 years my senior. Father Frank was extremely bright and a New Yorker, through and through. He liked me, because I was comfortable with his banter: The man loved to argue!....
Father Frank was not above punctuating his points with the rhetorical question, "Don't you read the newspaper?"
While I was ill equipped in the late 1970s and early 1980s to put it in clear language, I once suggested to Father Frank that there was an undervaluing in the Church of the Sacrament of Marriage....Father Frank returned my volley with a not so gentle reminder of how wrong he thought me to be....he was absolutely right theologically, [but] he was missing an historical/sociological phenomenon, called "clericalism":...
this clericalist way of thinking overlooks the reality and relevance of unique personal vocation – the particular, essentially unrepeatable role in the carrying-out of his redemptive plan to which God calls each baptized person (Russell Shaw, On Clericalism, 5/6/08).
[In addition to clericalism, that era saw failures to proclaim the truth about human sexuality!] At least since the late 1970s / early 1980s, numerous Catholics (clergy, religious, and laity) have been acting as though
When bishops, priests, deacons, religious, and lay people have difficulty understanding the exalted calling to marriage - the call to cooperate in God's very work of creation in bringing forth new human lives - we must sadly realize that "clericalism" is alive and well.
Treating marriage as less than the exalted calling it is has done none of us any good (blog, 10/25/15)