Liberal Heretics and Communism: a Theological Compendium

Liberal heretics actually should tend toward sexual deviancies per mystical theology of their very nature as Sadducaical

Introduction

Three Loaves at Midnight: the 3 Mystical Sacraments of Community,  the Three Sacraments of Initiation

Before we commence to the analysis of liberalism in Christianity and beyond, it will be necessary to argue for a mystical meaning of the number 3 in the Scriptures that seem to typify the liberalism, namely, the 300 days wages that the alabaster jar could have been sold for to feed the poor, and the seemingly correlated one factor down, 30 pieces of silver that Judas attains to commit the greatest sin of all, the betrayal of Our Dear Lord and Savior, the Christ, the Anointed One.

To start, we have seen that just as there are five loaves and two fish, so heretics lose five sacraments and retain only two, the two not requiring the Episcopate, Baptism and Marriage. Too, the heretics must fish them out of the sea, a place of chaos, just as Protestantism is one great ocean of doctrinal chaos, the heretics being tossed to and fro by every wave of doctrine.

Too, we saw that just as there seven loaves and a few fish, so schismatics have all seven sacraments since they retain the Episcopate but fish a little in doctrinal chaos because they lack Peter.

Profoundly, the only other place where loaves are quantified in a seemingly sacramental manner is in the parable of the friend who comes at an inopportune hour requesting “three loaves”. Interestingly enough, there are three sacraments in one category, Initiation: Baptism, Confirmation, and Eucharist. Normally, they are given at the beginning of the day of life, as in the Eastern Rites, both of Catholicism and Orthodoxy, or, as in the Roman rite, spread out over the beginning of life. But some persons “journey a long time” in life before they find the Father’s House, and so arrive late, “at Midnight.” They are ready, since they are adults, for “all three loaves” at once, since they, too, are very hungry from such a long journey. Hence, “friend, a friend has come in from a long journey, and I have nothing to feed him. Please lend me three loaves!”

Hence, at the Easter Vigil, those adults who have never been “fed” any sacraments, but have been journeying in cold and hunger for so long, get “three wonderful loaves” all in one night!

The Left: This-Worldly-Focused Heretics, Aversion to Recognition of Sin

The left is soft-hearted. They have the compassionate experience to know that bad things happen to good people. They know that the suffering many times don’t deserve it, that they are victims. So they show compassion; they help the persons materially. But they, then, precisely because of disillusionment of so much innocent suffering, have lost faith in the other-worldly things. They say to themselves, where is this God of salvation? Of meaning and purpose and Plan? If there is a Plan, and meaning, and truths, wherefore so much senseless suffering of the innocent, and yet counterpart prosperity of the wicked? They, therefore, tend to downplay doctrine, truth, and the other-worldly concerns, and focus on the this-worldly corporal works of mercy.

Hence, in the scene of the woman lavishly anointing the head of Christ with an expensive alabaster jar of ointment, the disciples complain, “Why such waste? This alabaster jar could have been sold for 3 [three loaves of Initiation? The Sacraments of Initiation?] hundred days wages and given to the poor”.

The worship of the God-Man, the other-worldly Savior, and the seeking of mercy-- imaged by the woman lavishly anointing the head of Christ and, with painfully heart-felt contrition, seeking forgiveness, the necessary condition for salvation--is spurned for the sake of the corporal works of mercy.

Non-judgmental

In this scene, note, the sin of the woman is irrelevant, not even on the radar. Hence, this likely means that, as opposed to the hyper-Original Sin of the Pharisee, we have hyper-Anti-Original Sin, or the near total dismissal of sin and its culpability. Therefore, not only don’t judge the sinner, but neither the sin: virtually no one is very culpable at all. We must just care for the unfortunate; don’t worry about sin and all that. Even hyper-subjectivity enters in: if it is true that the Pharisee considers little of the subjective conditions that can diminish a person’s culpability, so the Sadduccaical heretic sees virtually no objectivity and only subjectivity, meaning, even if objective grave sin is present, subjective conditions almost always diminish or eliminate culpability, e.g,, same sex desires justify same sex activity; the woman’s dire plight justifies abortion; the suffering of the dying justified euthanasia.

"Compassion on the suffering"

The Sadduccaical heretical community does have compassion on the suffering, which is good, but it goes too far. In other words, just as the Pharisee is devoid of compassion, placing heavy burdens on the weak while not lifting a finger to help them, so the Sadduccaical community has such compassion and soft-heartedness that it is willing and able to cross serious moral boundaries to eliminate crosses. Hence, we reiterate: even if objective grave sin is present, subjective conditions almost always diminish or eliminate culpability, so that if doing the right thing in the midst of difficulty will require great sacrifice, the Sadduccaical heretical will say, let us alleviate your cross, even if we violate serious moral law, e.g., same sex activity, abortion, euthanasia, and so forth.

Excerpt of Theology of the Sadducaical Heretic [the Hyper-Corporal-Works-of-Mercy Christians]:

Liberal Christianity, Merely a Community

The Hyper-Corporal Mockery of the 3 Initiation Sacraments

Here, if we recall the the three sacraments of initiation, we see that they are the prize and joy of the hyper-corporal, interpreted, by the same liberals, in the context merely of the self-same corporal works of mercy, as merely a merely corporal community:

Hyper-Corporal Baptism: We are initiated into a mainly corporal community, the “Church,” where we share “faith” in humanity’s capacity by the “Spirit” to care for the less fortunate and down-trodden, where “salvation” will ultimately mean “all are fed”, physically, all are provided for in the material needs [effectively pushing towards communism].

“Repentance”, really only means, turn away from selfishness and help others corporally. In this regard, also, that Baptism truly washes away Original Sin is downplayed. Authentic Original Sin means that whereas human beings are not utterly depraved in nature, and, in fact, more or less naturally good, nevertheless, a serious tendency to sin and ignorance exists apart from grace and revelation. It is not to be hyperbolized yet must be taken seriously. The liberal interpretation downplays Original Sin to all but non-existent: People are basically really good and more prone to love and goodness than bad, if only they have what they need temporally. Virtually no-one has any substantial culpability. Hence, nearly all men will be saved in their view. Hence, Baptism is more emphasized as, again, entrance into a Community versus washing away sin and redeeming. Baptism is also liturgical, which is heartfelt, hence, the left is very diverse and inclusive liturgically.

Hyper-Corporal Confirmation: Authentic Confirmation has spiritual gifts to enable other-worldly salvation. It makes one a mature member of the Church. For the liberal, spiritual gifts are replaced with natural talents, or at best, spiritual gifts that are more oriented toward compassion and “love”, rather than concrete gifts to help one on the spiritual way of avoiding sin, discernment of moral and truth situations, and doing that which is right. Hence, their gifts are used not so much to help you get to heaven but to build up the community, to be used to help those in need, as in worldly charisms. One is a mature member, not of so much a spiritual Communion journeying toward other-worldly bliss, but just a “Corporal Community” ever improving the world to a material utopia, where all are welcome, all are fed.

Hyper-Corporal Eucharist: The Eucharist is no longer primarily aimed at strengthening one’s spiritual condition to avoid sin and grow in spiritual sanctity, a sign of a Communion of persons joined by common faith and unity in an abundance of positively revealed spiritual truths and mysteries, and worshiping in unified, uniform Liturgy, but becomes merely a “celebration and thanksgiving” of the vague, soft-headed “do unto others as you would have them do unto you” community that is “one in exercising the corporal works of mercy.” Hence, because the left downplays the mind, believing as “one” in positive explicit doctrines is downplayed. What you “believe” is less important than that you are “compassionate.” Hence, again, virtually all men will be saved regardless of beliefs and religion. And, effectively, the “food” of the Eucharist is no longer an end unto itself but merely pointing toward that time when all humanity is “fed” literally, when all humanity has enough corporal sustenance.

The Hyper-Corporal Mockery of the 4 non-Initiation Sacraments

The other sacraments [besides the 3 Sacraments of Initiation into COMMUNITY, the gay, effeminate conception of the Faith] they would rather leave behind:

Confession? No way, we are not sinners. That is offensive. We are all victims. Consider, too, across all of Western Europe and Northern America, amongst other places, the land of Hyper-Corporal Christianity, confessions lines are veritably empty. And hardly anything is really bad. Even if it is objectively serious, virtually no culpability is ever present. Hardly anyone is really culpable at all for what they do. Just give people food, clothing, and shelter, and then they will be good people.

Marriage? Who can live chaste lives? They, per St Timothy’s Letter, “have the semblance of godliness but deny its power thereof.” Sexuality is based on affection for them, less about children. The pull of our instincts simply cannot be curbed by Jesus or the sacraments, and children are more burdens than blessings. So, admittedly, chastity, in the sense of no fornication, no artificial birth control, no abortion, and gay persons living celibate lives, would be nice, they say, but it isn’t practical. So let us go ahead and support sexual activity that is immoral and make provisions for it (artificial birth control, divorce, abortion, gay pride).

Holy Orders? No way! Patriarchs are tyrants! In fact, let us make WOMEN the supreme ones in authority: in ordination, in teaching, in preaching, … There is a radical push in Western "Catholicism" to ordain women. And even though, "as of yet", women are not ordained, Liberal Catholicism is saturated with women leadership roles to a very low amount of male forms, and the priests, in general, are effeminate and unmanly, if not physically, then certainly spiritually. An authentic patriarch has spiritual potency; when he descends from the altar down upon his bride, the parish community, he is called to proactively penetrate her innermost mind and heart and impregnate her with real seed, real substance: truth, doctrine, meaning, mystery, purpose, and real inspiration to go and live what she has learned, so help her God. The dragon's mockery of the patriarch is effeminacy: the priest is spiritually impotent, and what seed might come forth from him is largely sterile, since it is mainly dessert--no main course. Hence, pretty much, the anti-patriarch, the effeminate counterfeit of what a priest should be, just massages his bride's abdomen gently and gives her strawberry shortcake before she slumbers.

Anointing of the Sick? Is there meaning in human suffering? Can we really help save souls by offering up our crosses to God? Most believe- not really; God is hands off to this world; His involvement is minimal, if non-existent. Suffering should be eliminated at nearly all costs: if it gets bad, you should be able to shed substantial burdens: euthanasia, abortion, same-sex activity, and so forth.

Excerpt:

Liberal Christianity and the Effeminization of God

Man to Woman images Creator to Creature

Now, we shall argue for the profound relationship and analogy between the spiritual relationship of Creator to creature and the physical relationship between man and bride. This will end up manifesting how spiritual errors in how one views God in relationship to His People can lead, intrinsically, to warped conceptions of sexuality.

To being, let us consider the theology of the Creator/creature relationship. God the Creator comes down upon us, the creature. He overshadows us. He then penetrates our inmost being, our soul, and infuses us with spiritual life--spiritual love--and truth--mysteries for our mind. The creature, us, receives this love into our being, conceives it, and brings forth new life to others. Too, everything we have, we only receive from God. Even our freedom is a gift. God is the initiator of the gift. It is from Him that the seed of all existence, of grace, of truth, flows.

In a total analogy of this wondrous love between Creator and creature, the sacramental nature of marriage bears forth the mystery. The loving man, the spouse of the woman, contains the seed of life. The man initiates the gift, like the Creator. The man's sexual nature is proceeding, just as the truth and grace proceeds from the Creator. The woman's sexual nature is receptive, indicating that the creature is in a receptive relationship to God, receiving into its inner being the gift of God--grace for the will and truth for the intellect.

The man comes down upon his beloved bride in love, overshadowing her. He then enters her inmost being, giving the total gift of himself. He shows his love in movements of gentleness, a strength that holds her tight, but gracefully. And then, at the apex, life pours forth into her inmost being, and this can then give rise to new life, another priceless person, that the woman carries within herself before bearing it forth to the world, another infinite love as gift.

What Liberalism does to God

Liberalism severely downplays the other-worldly, as we have seen, in favor of corporal works of mercy, as in “What a waste: this expensive alabaster jar could have been sold for 300 pence and given to the poor.” So--noting that in the Creator/creature relationship, the Creator is in the other world, and the creature is in this world--when the other-worldly, or Creator, is minimized in importance, as in liberalism, or hyper-corporal-works-of-mercy Christianity, the Creator role descends down to earth in the symbolism of the creature. But the woman symbolizes the creature! Therefore, with liberal Christianity, the Creator becomes imaged in the woman and is also blurred between man and woman symbolism, hence. the effeminization of religion, of leadership, of God. This is why liberal Christianity has effeminate priests and bishops, hyper-involvement of women in leadership, and a weak God (God cannot help suffering; God is impotent in the face of evil), and also why it very much embraces an effeminate manner of religion and all manners of sexual deviance.

Liberal Christianity as Mere Community of Corporal-Works of Mercy

The Left Counterfeit Church and the Woman with the Alabaster Jar

Returning to the Woman with the Alabaster Jar scene, the jar worth 300 days wages then also gives rise to a counterfeit “woman.” The true woman is contrite, recognizing her sin and need for mercy and resolved to sin no more. She worships the Christ completely, in all His facets: teachings, sacraments, patriarchy.

The counterfeit woman then offers a 3 x 10 x 10 pseudo-worship [300 days wages], effectively a type of the liberal Catholic establishment of the last generation. More or less, the liberal “Catholic Church” is nothing more than a limp-wristed, substanceless gathering of effeminate persons bent on merely the corporal works of mercy. It has disemboweled itself of anything meaningful from an other-worldly standpoint. Liberal RCIA catechists adore Easter Vigil, because there, their 3 treasured sacraments of initiation are supreme. For them, the elect are not entering the Church in its totality: truth, and grace, not merely community. No, for them, it IS just a community. They have, as St Paul prophesied, “a semblance of godliness but deny its power”.

So the liberal pseudo-Church throws out the four non-initiation sacraments she doesn’t want,and sells what supernatural essence is left in the Gospel for a WORLDLY [10 x 10] (10 can a Biblical symbol of the world, as some beasts and the dragon in OT and NT apocalypses, which are worldly, have ten horns, so that 10 x 10 is a desperate attempt to be “otherworldly”, but in fact just worldly) counterfeit of the 3 legitimate Sacraments of Community [3 x 10 x 10].

When the liberal Counterfeit Church reaches its apex and sheds all sense of the Christological, it becomes a merely secular entity, where the State replaces God, effectively, communism:

Communism, the Diabolical Counterfeit Community:

If 3 x 10 x 10 was a fake “other-worldly” “community” [3 is the number of Sacraments of Initiation, into a Community, the Church] [10, we saw, could be a symbol of the world, so that 10 x 10 is like a double dimension world, or “other-worldly”, but in fact really pseudo, as in liberal Christianity], so 3 x 10 pieces of silver can then image a purely worldly [10 by itself] counterfeit of the Christian Community [3], or secular messianism, the Whore, the Kingdom of Antichrist.

The 3 Sacraments are counterfeited, and, as just mentioned, since God has been utterly stripped from the “community”, the STATE REPLACES GOD!

Anti-Baptism: Have not faith in God and do what pleases Him, but have faith in the State and do its bidding. The propogranda and totalitarianism of the communist state.

Anti-Confirmation: You don't need spiritual gifts for your SPIRITUAL end, salvation in the NEXT life. Rather, you need worldly gifts for your TEMPORAL end in THIS life, your own personal worldly glory and the end of the state, which is its survival and prosperity.

Anti-Eucharist: You don't need SPIRITUAL food to work for the Kingdom of God and win the ultimate of the NEXT life, that all in the community may be fed spiritually. Rather, we need the State to provide all our PHYISICAL needs, that all may be fed LITERALLY in THIS life, that there be no more poverty.

And yet, the Christ has said, "The poor you will always have with you." It is absolutely NOT possible to eliminate the cross completely, and it is all the more diabolically impossible to solve the human problems apart from God's truth and grace: "The persecution that accompanies her pilgrimage on earth will unveil the ‘mystery of iniquity’ in the form of a RELIGIOUS DECEPTION OFFERING MEN AN APPARENT SOLUTION TO THEIR PROBLEMS AT THE PRICE OF APOSTASY FROM THE TRUTH." - CCC 574-575

But at the end of the world, the ultimate man of perdition, the Antichrist, will betray "all that is of God, yes, the God-Man," in order that he may have and give to humanity "all that this world can offer," 30 pieces of silver: 3 [the 3 Sacraments of Initiation into the Community] x 10 [mocked into counterfeits by the pure WORLD, the 3 Anti-Sacraments of the State, the Pseudo-Messianic "Community"]!